BLOG: HOW HAS NURSING INFORMATICS AND TECHNOLOGY IMPACTED YOUR PRACTICE?
For this Discussion, you will explore the impact of digital technology on nursing practice. Consider the influence these technologies may have on nursing practice, and what skills you might need to hone in on in order to address these needs.
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity. Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
WEEKLY RESOURCES
LEARNING RESOURCES
Required Readings
· Sipes, C. (2020). Project management for the advanced practice nurse (2nd ed.). Springer Publishing.
· Chapter 4, “Planning: Project Management—Phase 2” (pp. 75–120)
· American Nurses Association. (2015). Nursing informatics Links to an external site. : Scope and standards of practice (2nd ed.).
· “Evolution of Nursing Informatics Competencies” (pp. 37–41)
· “The Future of Nursing Informatics” (pp. 52–62)
· “Standard 3: Outcomes Identification” (p. 71)
· “Standard 4: Planning” (p. 72)
· American Hospital Association. (n.d.). Innovative models of care delivery: Addressing transitions across the care continuum Links to an external site. . https://www.aha.org/system/files/media/file/2019/05/Innovative-Models-of-Care.pdf
· Guest in VSee. (2020). 7 ways technology is transforming the nursing field Links to an external site. . VSee.com. https://vsee.com/blog/technology-transforming-nursing-field
· The Medical Futurist. (2020). 10 ways technology is changing healthcare Links to an external site. . https://medicalfuturist.com/ten-ways-technology-changing-healthcare/
· Zipfel, N., van der Nat, P. B., Rensing, B. J. W. M., Daeter, E. J., Westert, G. P., & Groenewoud, A. S. (2019). The implementation of change model adds value to value-based healthcare: A qualitative study Links to an external site. . BMC Health Services Research, 19(1), 643. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/waldenu.edu?url=https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4498-y
R equired Media
· Schade, M. (2016, January 11). How to do a GAP Analysis Links to an external site. . [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8xXReyiFtBY
· Project Manager. (2014, June 2). What is a work breakdown structure Links to an external site. ? [Video]. YouTube.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEWhnodF6ig
· Project Manager. (2016, March 11). Gantt Charts, Simplified – The Project Management Training Links to an external site. . [Video]. YouTube.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGkHjby1xKM
TO PREPARE
· Consider your nursing background and professional interests as you view the video.
· What potential skills, knowledge, or competencies to ensure quality of care and safety improvements, might you need to develop for your healthcare organization or nursing practice to ensure continued quality care and safety?
Post a blog to address the following:
· Explore the pivotal role of informatics competencies in enhancing the quality of care and safety in your nursing practice.
· Assignment Rubric Details Close
· Rubric
· NURS_8210_Week3_Blog_Rubric
NURS_8210_Week3_Blog_Rubric
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMain Posting: Idea and Content
60 to >49.0 pts
Excellent
• Thoroughly responds to the blog prompt/s. • Post provides comprehensive insight, understanding, or reflection about the topic through a focused analysis of the topic supported by personal experiences and/or examples. • Personal opinions are expressed and are clearly related to the topic, activity or process identified in blog prompts. • The post reflects in-depth engagement with the topic. • Posts main blog by due date.
49 to >38.0 pts
Good
• Responds to all of the blog prompt/s. • Post provides insight, understanding, or reflection about the topic through a reasonably focused analysis of the topic supported by personal experiences and/or examples. • Personal opinions are expressed and are but not fully developed to align with blog prompts. • The post reflects moderate engagement with the topic. • Posts main blog by due date.
38 to >27.0 pts
Fair
• Partially responds to the blog prompt/s. • Posts are typically short and may contain some irrelevant material. • The post is mostly description or summary without connections or analysis between ideas. • The post reflects minimal engagement with the topic. • Posts main blog by due date.
27 to >0 pts
Poor
• Does not respond to the blog prompt/s or entries lack insight, depth or are superficial. • The entries are short and are frequently irrelevant to the events. • They do not express opinion clearly and show little understanding. • The post does not reflect engagement with the topic. • Does not post main blog by due date.
60 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFirst Response: Post to colleague’s main blogpost shows evidence of insight, understanding, or reflective thought about the topic. NOTE: Responses to faculty are not counted as first or second colleague responses.
20 to >11.0 pts
Excellent
• Presents a focused and cohesive viewpoint in addressing this response. • Response includes focused questions or examples related to colleague’s post. • Response stimulates dialogue and commentary. • Posts by due date.
11 to >6.0 pts
Good
• Presents a specific viewpoint that is focused and cohesive. • Response includes at least one focused question or example related to colleague’s post. • There is some attempt to stimulate dialogue and commentary. • Posts by due date.
6 to >2.0 pts
Fair
• Presents a specific viewpoint but lacks supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. • The posting is brief and reflects minimal effort to connect with colleague. • Posts by due date.
2 to >0 pts
Poor
• Response lacks a specific viewpoint and supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. • The post does not stimulate dialogue or connect with the colleague. • Does not post by due date.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSecond Response: Post to second colleague blog post shows evidence of insight, understanding, or reflective thought about the topic.
20 to >11.0 pts
Excellent
• Presents a focused and cohesive viewpoint in addressing this response. • Response includes focused questions or examples related to colleague’s post. • Response stimulates dialogue and commentary. • Posts by due date.
11 to >6.0 pts
Good
• Presents a specific viewpoint that is focused and cohesive. • Response includes at least one focused question or example related to colleague’s post. • There is some attempt to stimulate dialogue and commentary. • Posts by due date.
6 to >2.0 pts
Fair
• Presents a specific viewpoint but lacks supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. • The posting is brief and reflects minimal effort to connect with colleague. • Posts by due date.
2 to >0 pts
Poor
• Response lacks a specific viewpoint and supporting examples or focused questions related to colleague’s post. • The does not stimulate dialogue or connect with the colleague. • Does not post by due date.
20 pts
Total Points: 100
Interested in getting help with this assignment?
Get a professional writing team to work on your assignment!
Order Now
Recent posts
For this final assignment, you will prepare a brief paper detailing the steps undertaken to complete a presentation that disseminates information you assemble
Please choose to answer only one of the 2 following questions. Option 1: In your opinion and based on scientific, peer-reviewed published evidence, does child
At the beginning of the previous academic year, the institution announced it would drop football at the conclusion of the season. The announcement created pub
you will review current research in Personality and provide a critical evaluation of that personality research through an annotated bibliography. An annotated
In Module 5, we considered the third in our three-part series on research design. Specifically, the focus was on the longitudinal studies, in which the resear
Need help with a similar or different Task?
We have the best writers to help you. Hire Writer Now
