Order InstructionsThis paper is based on Bertrand Russell’s “The Problems of Philosophy” and will need to have at least one quote from one of the three chapters provided in the attachments (pp. 68-81). Below are the intricate details required for the informal essay:
After completing this week’s assigned chapters of Russell’s The Problems of Philosophy as well as the other required readings, do the following:
First, briefly summarize what you learned from reading the Russell chapters this week. Then, set about achieving your main goal in this assignment, beyond the summary, which is to tie together any theories, themes, concepts, important ideas, arguments, important observations, etc. you discover in Russell’s work and the particular philosophical views and the general content covered in the other readings.
For example, in Week Four, you will be summarizing Chapters XIII-XV in The Problems of Philosophy, and then you will look for how what he says there links up with, adds to, or even conflicts with the philosophical views and ideas of James, Kierkegaard, and Nietzsche. Chapter XV will likely be the focus of the comparative part of your commentary.
Grading Guidline:
– Essay neutrally and accurately synthesizes the main ideas and arguments in the considered texts, along with key supporting claims, in decidedly original language. Demonstrates deep intellectual engagement with and understanding of material.
– Essay demonstrates an in-depth reflection on, and personalization of, the theories, concepts, and/or strategies presented in the course materials to date. Viewpoints and interpretations are insightful and well supported. Clear, detailed examples are provided, as applicable.
– Essay skillfully breaks down the arguments, issues, or problems under discussion into relevant parts and also makes clear, incisive, and accurate connections between the parts. In addition, the essay astutely evaluates the quality of the arguments or positions defended and provides penetrating suggestions for how they can be improved or made logically stronger.
– Response shows compelling evidence of synthesis of ideas presented and insights gained throughout the entire course and makes highly original and penetrating interrelationships between Russell’s thinking that of other philosophers covered in the course.
– Writing is clear, concise, and well organized with excellent sentence/paragraph construction. Thoughts are expressed in a coherent and logical manner. Errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax are absent or extremely minor and minimal in number. Comprehensibility and lucidity in word use and originality in phrasing make the essay a pleasure to read.
Interested in getting help with this assignment?
Get a professional writing team to work on your assignment!
Order Now
Recent postsFor this final assignment, you will prepare a brief paper detailing the steps undertaken to complete a presentation that disseminates information you assemble
Please choose to answer only one of the 2 following questions. Option 1: In your opinion and based on scientific, peer-reviewed published evidence, does child
At the beginning of the previous academic year, the institution announced it would drop football at the conclusion of the season. The announcement created pub
you will review current research in Personality and provide a critical evaluation of that personality research through an annotated bibliography. An annotated
In Module 5, we considered the third in our three-part series on research design. Specifically, the focus was on the longitudinal studies, in which the resear
Need help with a similar or different Task?
We have the best writers to help you. Hire Writer Now
