AN EXTENDED LITERATURE REVIEW. A relevant research question is developed: – Question – Does being elderly impact treatment from colorectal cancer? The question is in the PICO format – for quantitative research. A logical and focused literature search is undertaken to find current evidence about it: See the Articles attached. TASK REQUIREMENTS: – Findings – present the findings of your analysis as the emerging themes. (Findings from the papers selected should be presented only). Please compare and contrast studies and comment on the body of the literature on the topic. You could split this Findings section into sub-sections (themes) with headings around the aspects of care or treatment within the topic being reviewed. This section should not just list one paper after another. You need to draw out from your reading of the papers overarching messages. Please structure this section in such a way that you clearly address the research question/title. You will need to consider what methods were used to study the area and how rigorously were they applied? E.g. look for bias (was the person doing the research known to the participants) or conflict of interest (was the research carried out on behalf of a drugs company). To do this you will need to use the information obtained from applying the critical appraisal tool to your chosen research papers. – Discussion – provide a critical discussion of your findings, considering implications for practice and further research. Please provide a critical discussion of the findings from your review. What do the findings mean? Evaluate the significance of the similarities and differences found in your comparison and contrast of the articles and make an in-depth interpretation on the themes’ issues. You can draw on the wider body of literature about your topic area. This is the place to include all the interesting articles that you found which make important points, but which did not directly answer your chosen research question/title. Include implications and recommendations for practice, education and management. Could the finding of this literature review be applied to your patients or your practice? If it cannot be applied, why is this? Can you be specific about how your findings can influence the quality of care? For example, an education package for nurses, an assessment tool for practice or a set of policy guidelines. You will also need to comment on whether further research should be undertaken and if so how should it be designed? You may want to split this section into sub sections. – Strengths and limitations – consider both strengths and weaknesses of your review. Please discuss how successfully you have addressed your review question and thereby the practice significance of your findings. You should consider both strengths and weaknesses of your review. – Conclusion – Summarise key points from review. Please look back over the arguments you have developed and summarising the main points of your analysis. Referencing and research requirements: Please reference your work according to the Harvard style as defined in Cite Them Right Online (http://www.citethemrightonline.com). THE LEARNING OUTCOMES: 1. Demonstrate a critical understanding of the research process, its principles and benefits to nursing (UK) 2. Critically evaluate strategies for collecting and appraising literature to conduct a coherent literature review 3. Demonstrate a questioning and analytical approach to the utilisation of research findings in practice, and a sound ability to develop evidence-based recommendations for enhancing nursing care  CoreText(s): (will be helpful if you add some references from the list below to reflect local library study) 1). Aveyard, H. (2018) Doing a literature review in health and social care: a practical guide. 4thEdition. Berkshire: Open University Press. 2). Bettany-Saltikov, D. (2012) How to do a systematic literature review in nursing [electronic resource] : a step-by-step guide, Maidenhead, Open University Press 3). Gray, J. and Grove, S., (2020) Burns and Grove’s the practice of nursing research: appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence. 9th Edition. St. Louis: Elsevier/Saunders. Additional Reading: • Gerrish, K., and Lacy, A. (2010) The Research Process in Nursing. 6th Ed. Wiley Blackwell • Parahoo, K (2014) Nursing Research: Principles, Process and Issues. 2nd Ed. Palgrave Macmillan • Ellis, P. (2013) Understanding Research for Nursing Students (Transforming Nursing Practice Series). 2nd Ed. Sage Publishing • Holloway, I and Galvin, K. (2017) Qualitative Research in Nursing and Healthcare. 4th Ed. Wiley Blackwell The following are relevant articles worth reading as appropriate: – • Beyea, S. C and Slattery, M-J. (2013). Historical Perspectives on Evidence-Based Nursing. Nursing Science Quarterly. Vol. 26. (2), pp.152-155. • Greenhalgh, T. (2014) How to Read a Paper: The Basics of Evidence Based Medicine 5ed. London, BMJ Publishing Group. PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHMENTS ANSWER. PAPER DETAILS Academic Level PHD Subject Area Nursing Paper Type Dissertation Number of Pages 7 Page(s)/1925 words Sources 35 Format APA Spacing Double Spacing If the sample didn’t load click the reload button belowReload Order a plagiarism free paper today !
Need help with a similar or different Task?
We have the best writers to help you. Hire Writer Now
