Order InstructionsYou can choose either of the two philosophers listed below to write about, and I have added the material required to cite from for them both (only required for the one philosopher you choose). Nietzsche’s reading is only required for Preface, Parts 1, 2, & 3: [§1-62] pp. 3-57. Kierkegaard’s reading is required for (entire), pp. 1-61. Needless to say, only one of their works needs to be cited (based on whomever you choose). Below are the requirements:
I) Q&A: The topic for the discussion is Critics of Religion. The word-count requirement for each Q&A is loosely set at a minimum of 250 words; however, a Q&A post of fewer than 150 words will receive no credit.
Compose and answer an original question based on the required readings. Your question should address the writings, ideas, and theories of one of the following philosophers:
Søren Kierkegaard
Friedrich Nietzsche
To complete this discussion topic, please start a new discussion thread in the following format:
My second Week Four discussion question is:
My answer to this question is:
Here are the grading guidelines:
– Q&A question is highly original, penetrating and provocative. Insightfully cuts to the heart of important issues relating to required topic areas.
– Analyzes the issue with a clear sense of scope and context, including an assessment of audience. Identifies influence of context. Questions all assumptions and addresses any bias that may be related to the underlying the issue.
– Answer shows evidence of exemplary understanding of important and relevant content and concepts. Answer is insightful, thought-provoking, comprehensive, and likely to promote further substantive conversation and debate. Secure grasp of inner relationship of issues and concepts; supporting material is on point and expertly selected. Answer falls within recommended word-count range while being both concise and thorough; makes original, insightful, and thought-provoking use of several sources from course Recommended Readings.
– Position demonstrates ownership or originality. Appropriately identifies own position, drawing support from experience and information not from assigned sources. Justifies own view while integrating contrary interpretations. Hypothesis demonstrates sophisticated thought.
– Evidence of adept source evaluation skills. Examines evidence and questions accuracy and relevance. Recognizes bias. Sequence of presentation reflects clear organization of ideas, subordinating for importance and impact.
– Addresses diverse perspectives from a variety of sources to qualify analysis. Any analogies are used effectively. Clearly justifies own view while respecting views of others. Analysis of other positions is accurate and respectful. Evidence of reflection and self-assessment.
– Identifies and discusses conclusions, implications, and consequences. Considers context, assumptions, and evidence. Qualifies own assertions. Consequences are considered and integrated. Implications are developed, and ambiguities recognized and considered. Leaves reader with meaningful takeaways and ideas for further research.
– Writing employs graceful and effective use of language that skillfully communicates meaning to readers with clarity and fluency. May at times be nuanced and eloquent. Errors are minimal or absent. Style is appropriate for audience. Organization is clear; transitions between ideas enhance presentation. Consistent use of appropriate format. Few if any problems with other components of presentation. High levels of articulateness and sophistication in the overall writing, leaving the reader informed and wanting more.
Interested in getting help with this assignment?
Get a professional writing team to work on your assignment!
Order Now
Recent postsFor this final assignment, you will prepare a brief paper detailing the steps undertaken to complete a presentation that disseminates information you assemble
Please choose to answer only one of the 2 following questions. Option 1: In your opinion and based on scientific, peer-reviewed published evidence, does child
At the beginning of the previous academic year, the institution announced it would drop football at the conclusion of the season. The announcement created pub
you will review current research in Personality and provide a critical evaluation of that personality research through an annotated bibliography. An annotated
In Module 5, we considered the third in our three-part series on research design. Specifically, the focus was on the longitudinal studies, in which the resear
Need help with a similar or different Task?
We have the best writers to help you. Hire Writer Now
