Critiquing a Research Article for Quality Standards
Research Issue and Purpose: The research problem is not clearly stated, and the aim of the research is also unclear. The authors propose to search for personality disorders (PDs) as well as maladaptive interpersonal schemas in patients with misophonia. However, they fail to present a clear rationale or research questions. Participants: The sample size is too small, with only three participants involved. Therefore, the small sub-sample size decreases the generalizability of the findings and hinders the researchers from drawing any serious conclusions (Riener et al., 2020). Additionally, the authors do not provide enough information concerning the sampling method or about who is excluded from this research. Research Design: There is no clear outline of the principal research design in the study. It seems to be a case series or qualitative study, but the authors do not clearly state the design or give a reason for their decision. Data Collection/Generation Methods: Researchers applied different tools including the Amsterdam Misophonia Scale (A-MISO-S), On-Structured Clinical Inventory for DSM-IV Personality Disorders (SCID-II), Young Schema Questionnaire (YSQ-L3), Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-Y) (Natalini et al., 2019). However, they do not include evidence of the suitability and credibility of these tools as it relates to their study.
In general, the study appeared to involve several methodological issues, comprising a small sample size, lack of clarity in research design, and inappropriate discussion of the limitations and implications. It is highly recommended that the authors address these problems to improve the validity and reliability of the study.
References
Natalini, E., Dimaggio, G., Varakliotis, T., Fioretti, A., & Eibenstein, A. (2019). Misophonia, maladaptive schemas and personality disorders: A report of three cases. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 50(1), 29–35.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-019-09438-3
Riener, G., Schneider, S. O., & Wagner, V. (2020). Addressing validity and generalizability concerns in field experiments. MPI Collective Goods Discussion Paper, (2020/16). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3637868
PLEASE RESPOND TO THIS POST. must include an 1 APA reference to a relevant scholarly article. 1 PARAGRAPH PLEASE
Interested in getting help with this assignment?
Get a professional writing team to work on your assignment!
Order Now
Recent postsFor this final assignment, you will prepare a brief paper detailing the steps undertaken to complete a presentation that disseminates information you assemble
Please choose to answer only one of the 2 following questions. Option 1: In your opinion and based on scientific, peer-reviewed published evidence, does child
At the beginning of the previous academic year, the institution announced it would drop football at the conclusion of the season. The announcement created pub
you will review current research in Personality and provide a critical evaluation of that personality research through an annotated bibliography. An annotated
In Module 5, we considered the third in our three-part series on research design. Specifically, the focus was on the longitudinal studies, in which the resear
Need help with a similar or different Task?
We have the best writers to help you. Hire Writer Now
