Order InstructionsDissociative Disoder• Sadock, B. J., Sadock, V. A., & Ruiz, P. (2015). Kaplan & Sadock’s synopsis of psychiatry (11th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.o Chapter 12, “Dissociative Disorders”• Osmosis. (2017, November 20). Dissociative disorders – causes, symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, pathology Links to an external site. [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/XF2zeOdE5GYLinks to an external site.• Mad Medicine. (2019, August 18). Dissociative disorders (Psychiatry) – USMLE Step 1 Links to an external site. [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/Iz03M9pwhs0Links to an external site.• Grande, T. (2018, October 22). The dissociative identity disorder controversy (Trauma vs. Iatrogenic) Links to an external site.. [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zqTP0CP9aDk
THE ASSIGNMENT (2 PAGES)• Explain the controversy that surrounds dissociative disorders.• Explain your professional beliefs about dissociative disorders, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from the literature.• Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.• Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important.Rubric_RubricNRNP_6665_Week9_Assignment_RubricCriteria Ratings PtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn 2–3 pages, address the following:• Explain the controversy that surrounds dissociative disorders. 15 to >13.0 ptsExcellentThe response includes an accurate and concise explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. 13 to >11.0 ptsGoodThe response includes an accurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. 11 to >10.0 ptsFairThe response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. 10 to >0 ptsPoorThe response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. Or the response is missing.15 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Explain your professional beliefs about dissociative disorders, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from the literature. 25 to >22.0 ptsExcellentThe response includes a thorough and well-organized explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale demonstrates critical thinking and is strongly supported with three scholarly references. 22 to >19.0 ptsGoodThe response includes a well-organized explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is clear and appropriately supported with three scholarly references. 19 to >17.0 ptsFairThe response includes a somewhat vague explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is somewhat unclear and references either provide weak support for the rationale or are not scholarly/current. 17 to >0 ptsPoorThe response includes a vague explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is unclear and references are inappropriate. Or the response is missing.25 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. 30 to >26.0 ptsExcellentThe response includes an accurate and concise explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. 26 to >23.0 ptsGoodThe response includes an accurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. 23 to >20.0 ptsFairThe response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. 20 to >0 ptsPoorThe response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. Or the response is missing.30 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important. 15 to >13.0 ptsExcellentThe response includes an accurate and concise explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. 13 to >11.0 ptsGoodThe response includes an accurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. 11 to >10.0 ptsFairThe response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. 10 to >0 ptsPoorThe response includes a vague and inaccurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Or, response is missing.15 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria. 5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria. 4 to >3.5 ptsGoodParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive. 3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic. 3 to >0 ptsPoorParagraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation 5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors 4 to >3.5 ptsGoodContains one or two grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors 3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairContains three or four grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors 3 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. 5 to >4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct APA format with no errors 4 to >3.5 ptsGoodContains one or two APA format errors 3.5 to >3.0 ptsFairContains three or four APA format errors 3 to >0 ptsPoorContains many (five or more) APA format errors5 pts
Interested in getting help with this assignment?
Get a professional writing team to work on your assignment!
Order Now
Recent postsFor this final assignment, you will prepare a brief paper detailing the steps undertaken to complete a presentation that disseminates information you assemble
Please choose to answer only one of the 2 following questions. Option 1: In your opinion and based on scientific, peer-reviewed published evidence, does child
At the beginning of the previous academic year, the institution announced it would drop football at the conclusion of the season. The announcement created pub
you will review current research in Personality and provide a critical evaluation of that personality research through an annotated bibliography. An annotated
In Module 5, we considered the third in our three-part series on research design. Specifically, the focus was on the longitudinal studies, in which the resear
Need help with a similar or different Task?
We have the best writers to help you. Hire Writer Now
