In Module 2: Week 2’s Course Project: Develop a Topic Assignment, you identified a topic that exists in your field of study. In your own words, explain the topic you identified to your classmates and discuss the reasons you selected that specific topic. Share any personal experiences and observations that led you to choose this topic. Explain why the topic is important to address and use references to support your claims. Offer a Biblical worldview perspective on the topic and use Biblical references to support your claims
Unit4Discussion.docx
Unit4DiscussionGradingRubric11.pdf
EDUC 701
Discussion Assignment Instructions
In Module 2: Week 2’s Course Project: Develop a Topic Assignment, you identified a topic that exists in your field of study. In your own words, explain the topic you identified to your classmates and discuss the reasons you selected that specific topic. Share any personal experiences and observations that led you to choose this topic. Explain why the topic is important to address and use references to support your claims. Offer a Biblical worldview perspective on the topic and use Biblical references to support your claims.
The topic: The Impact of Technology on Academic Achievement
YOU ARE JUST DOING THE DISCUSSION NOT THE REPLIES.
You will complete two Discussions in this course. For each Discussion, you will post one thread of at least 400 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of the assigned Module: Week. You must then post two replies of at least 200 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of the assigned Module: Week with the exception of Module 8: Week 8, which is due on Friday. For each thread, you must support your assertions with at least two scholarly citations in addition to the Bible in current APA format. Any sources used in replies must also be referenced in current APA format. First-person is allowed in your posts.
For your replies, note that responses such as “I like what you said,” “That is a good comment,” and “I disagree with your comment” do not count as complete replies in and of themselves. Rather, state why you liked or disliked a peer’s thread, present additional thoughts or ideas, and provide alternative ideas/thoughts when you disagree. Courtesy in any disagreement is expected; however, you are expected to know and maintain proper online etiquette as outlined on the Student Expectations page in the Course Overview.
One of the goals of the Discussions is to encourage student community learning; thus, not every Discussion will have a comment from the instructor. Rather, the instructor will respond to a few posts in a way that adds to the conversation, asks a pertinent question, or summarizes some of the key points made by yourself or a classmate. Note that deadlines and other guidelines are meant to encourage optimal dialogue and demonstration of critical thought.
See the Discussion Grading Rubric for further details.
,
Criteria Ratings Points
Key Components- Thread
15 to >13.0 pts
Advanced
All the key components of the Discussion thread prompt were answered.
13 to >12.0 pts
Proficient
Most of the key components of the Discussion thread prompt were addressed.
12 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Several of the key components of the Discussion thread prompt were not addressed.
0 pts
Not Present
15 pts
Sources – Thread
10 to >9.0 pts
Advanced
All major points in the Discussion thread post were supported by two scholarly sources and the Bible.
9 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
Major points in the Discussion thread post were supported by one scholarly source and the Bible.
7 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Major points were supported by one scholarly source or the Bible.
0 pts
Not Present
10 pts
Replies 10 to >9.0 pts
Advanced
A minimum of two different replies. Each reply expounds on the thread and a contribution is made to the discussion with thoughtful analysis.
9 to >7.0 pts
Proficient
A minimum of two different replies. Each reply expounds on the thread and a contribution is made to the discussion.
7 to >0.0 pts
Developing
1-2 replies were made with little contribution made to the discussion.
0 pts
Not Present
10 pts
Mechanics- Thread/Replies
15 to >13.0 pts
Advanced
Minimal or no grammatical, spelling, and/or punctuation errors are present. Source referencing is provided in perfect current APA format. The thread post contains at least 400 words and each of the two replies contain at least 200 words.
13 to >12.0 pts
Proficient
A few grammatical, spelling, and/or punctuation errors are present, and/or 1 – 2 errors in current APA formatting are found. The thread post contains 375 – 399 words and/or one or more of the replies contain 190 – 199 words.
12 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Many grammatical, spelling, and/or punctuation errors are present, and/or 3 or more errors in current APA formatting are found. The thread post contains 374 or fewer words and/or one or more of the replies contain 189 or fewer words.
0 pts
Not Present
15 pts
Total Points: 50
Discussion Grading Rubric | EDUC701_D04_202420
Interested in getting help with this assignment?
Get a professional writing team to work on your assignment!
Order Now
Recent postsFor this final assignment, you will prepare a brief paper detailing the steps undertaken to complete a presentation that disseminates information you assemble
Please choose to answer only one of the 2 following questions. Option 1: In your opinion and based on scientific, peer-reviewed published evidence, does child
At the beginning of the previous academic year, the institution announced it would drop football at the conclusion of the season. The announcement created pub
you will review current research in Personality and provide a critical evaluation of that personality research through an annotated bibliography. An annotated
In Module 5, we considered the third in our three-part series on research design. Specifically, the focus was on the longitudinal studies, in which the resear
Need help with a similar or different Task?
We have the best writers to help you. Hire Writer Now
