Skip to content
Home » Is there a difference between common practice€ and best practice€?

Is there a difference between common practice€ and best practice€?

EVIDENCE-BASED PROJECT, PART 1: IDENTIFYING RESEARCH METHODOLOGIES
 
Is there a difference between “common practice” and “best practice”?
 
When you first went to work for your current organization, experienced colleagues may have shared with you details about processes and procedures. Perhaps you even attended an orientation session to brief you on these matters. As a “rookie,” you likely kept the nature of your questions to those with answers that would best help you perform your new role.
 
Over time and with experience, perhaps you recognized aspects of these processes and procedures that you wanted to question further. This is the realm of clinical inquiry.
 
Clinical inquiry is the practice of asking questions about clinical practice. To continuously improve patient care, all nurses should consistently use clinical inquiry to question why they are doing something the way they are doing it. Do they know why it is done this way, or is it just because we have always done it this way? Is it a common practice or a best practice?
 
In this Assignment, you will identify clinical areas of interest and inquiry and practice searching for research in support of maintaining or changing these practices. You will also analyze this research to compare research methodologies employed.
 
RESOURCES
 
Required Readings
 
· Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2023).  Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (5th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
 
· Chapter 2, “Asking Compelling Clinical Questions” (pp. 37–60)
 
· Chapter 22, “Generating Evidence Through Quantitative and Qualitative Research” (pp. 731–776)
 
· Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies.  Health Information and Libraries Journal Links to an external site. , 26, 91–108. doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
 
· Hoare, Z., & Hoe, J. (2013). Understanding quantitative research: Part 2.  Nursing Standard Links to an external site. , 27(18), 48–55. doi:10.7748/ns2013.01.27.18.48.c9488
 
· Hoe, J., & Hoare, Z. (2012). Understanding quantitative research: Part 1.  Nursing Standard Links to an external site. , 27(15), 52–57. doi:10.7748/ns2012.12.27.15.52.c9485
 
· Walden University Library. (n.d.-a).  Databases A-Z: Nursing Links to an external site. . Retrieved September 6, 2019, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/az.php?s=19981
 
· Walden University Library. (n.d.-b).  Evaluating resources: Primary & secondary sources Links to an external site. .Links to an external site.  Retrieved January 22, 2020, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/evaluating/sources
 
· Walden University Library. (n.d.-f).  Keyword searching: Finding articles on your topic: Boolean terms. Links to an external site.  Retrieved September 19, 2018, from http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/keyword/boolean
 
· Walden University Library. (n.d.-g). Keyword searching: Finding articles on your topic: Introduction to keyword searchingLinks to an external site. . Retrieved September 19, 2018, from http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/keyword/searching-basics
 
· Walden University Library. (n.d.-i).  Quick Answers: What are filtered and unfiltered resources in nursing?Links to an external site. Retrieved September 6, 2019, from https://academicanswers.waldenu.edu/faq/73299
 
· Document: Matrix Worksheet Template (Word Document)
 
To Prepare:
 
· Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry. Keep in mind that the clinical issue you identify for your research will stay the same for the entire course. 
 
· Based on the clinical issue of interest and using keywords related to the clinical issue of interest, search at least four different databases in the Walden Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles related to your clinical issue of interest. You should not be using systematic reviews for this assignment, select original research articles.
 
· Review the results of your peer-reviewed research and reflect on the process of using an unfiltered database to search for peer-reviewed research.
 
· Reflect on the types of research methodologies contained in the four relevant peer-reviewed articles you selected.
 
Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies
 
After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each of the four peer-reviewed articles. Your analysis should include the following:
 
· The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format.
 
· A brief (1-paragraph) statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest.
 
· A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article.
 
· A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific.
 
· A brief (1- to 2-paragraph) description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected.

Interested in getting help with this assignment?
Get a professional writing team to work on your assignment!
Order Now
Recent postsFor this final assignment, you will prepare a brief paper detailing the steps undertaken to complete a presentation that disseminates information you assemble
Please choose to answer only one of the 2 following questions. Option 1: In your opinion and based on scientific, peer-reviewed published evidence, does child
At the beginning of the previous academic year, the institution announced it would drop football at the conclusion of the season. The announcement created pub
you will review current research in Personality and provide a critical evaluation of that personality research through an annotated bibliography. An annotated
In Module 5, we considered the third in our three-part series on research design. Specifically, the focus was on the longitudinal studies, in which the resear

Need help with a similar or different Task?

We have the best writers to help you. Hire Writer Now

ORDER NOW