PDSA Practice Improvement Plan PDSA Practice Improvement Plan The assignment will be divided into four phases.
The PDSA project will give the student the experience to initiate and coordinate planned changes in a healthcare organization. This assignment aims to engage the student in analyzing an evidence-based practice scenario within their clinical experiences.
Students will use the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s (2020) Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) Directions and Examples as a guideline for this assignment (Web link Available in Modules)
Part I: Plan
Problem Identification
Problem Identification: Identify a clinical problem you observed at the clinical site. Review policies, procedures, and guidelines of care to assess if there is a standard or policy to improve practice. Talking with patients about their perceptions of the care. Is there a problem, a patient, or a population negatively affected by the present standard of practice?
Review of Literature
Review of literature: What level of knowledge is out there to address the problem? Are there any evidence-based guidelines already published? Most of the literature reviewed should utilize systematic reviews, meta-analyses, or clinical guidelines. Individual studies review expert opinion articles, and clinical articles can be used as supportive literature for clinical issues with limited research.
Need to reference a minimum of five research articles on the identified problem.
I plan to: You will write a concise statement of what you plan to do in your PDSA project
I hope this produces: Here you will put a measurement or outcome that you hope to achieve with your project
PICO(T) Question
Please see template posted in Canvas titled, “PICOT Question Template.pdf”
Use template to develop your PICOT question
Must state which template you used (i.e., intervention, therapy, prognosis/prediction, diagnosis, etiology, meaning)
The Process
Steps to Execute: Write the steps you’re going to take in the PDSA cycle, the population you are working with, and the time limit
The population could be a patient, a problem, a population, a unit, a division, or an organization problem.
The time limit that you will do this project—remember, it does not have to be long enough to get your results.
Part II: Do
After you have your plan, you will execute it or set it in motion.
During this implementation, you will be keen to watch what happens once you do this.
What did you observe? Here you will write down observations you have during your implementation. This may include how the patients react, how the nurses react, and how it fits in with your organizational system. You will ask, “Did everything go as planned?” “Did I have to modify the plan?”
Part III: Study
After implementation, you will study the results.
What did you learn? Did you meet your measurement goals? Here you will record how well it worked, if you met your goal.
Part IV: Act
What did you conclude from this cycle? You will write what you came away with for this implementation and whether it worked. Moreover, if it did not work, what can you do differently in your next cycle to address that? Are you ready to spread it across your entire practice if it did work?
Dissemination
In this section, you will list the materials that you handed out in your presentation at the clinical site
Handouts
Copies of PowerPoint presentation to leadership at clinical practicum site
PowerPoint Presentation of PDSA Project
Students will use the PDSA Project – PowerPoint Presentation Template posted in Canvas to present their PDSA project to the preceptor and other team members at the clinical practicum site and for grading in Canvas under Assignments
The presentation should follow all the criteria posted in the PDSA Project – PowerPoint Presentation Template: (Please also review Grading Rubric below before starting assignment)
a) Download PDSA Project – PowerPoint Presentation Template that is posted in Canvas
b) Design a handout to give out on the day of your presentation to your preceptor, unit leadership, and other team members at your practicum site.
The handout should contain a brief summary of the PDSA project including:
Title of Project
Problem Identified
Plan: State PICOT question
Do: What did you observe? (Use data to answer this question)
Study: What did you learn? Did you meet your measurement goals?
Act: What did you conclude from this cycle?
Add photos, graphics, tables, etc to your handout to enhance presentation of information
A copy of the handout should be included in your PowerPoint presentation.
c) A minimum of 3 discussion questions prepared by student to pose to their audience to generate discuss presentation about the project and potential for implementation.(List your discussion questions as an “Appendix” in your PowerPoint presentation)
d) Presentation delivery: professional demeanor, professional dress, and generated discussion. (Take a picture of yourself and the staff on the day of the presentation and copy and paste it to your title PowerPoint slide)
e) After you present your PDSA PowerPoint presentation at your clinical site. (Please add audio to your presentation before your submit your PowerPoint (PP) presentation in Canvas for grading, so I can hear it as if I attended your live presentation at your clinical site)
Please upload/submit the PowerPoint presentation in Canvas using the above guidelines before the due date and time.
TurnItIn
When submitting your assignment in Canvas, please note that your work will be reviewed by TurnItIn for similarities to other published work. Any work that scores 20% or higher in TurnItIn will receive a grade of 0 points. If your score is 20% or higher, please review to see where your total similarity percentage is coming from. Then, revise your work and resubmit until your score is less than 20%.
Rubic-PDSAProjectPowerPointPresentation.docx
PDSA Project Presentation
PDSA Project Presentation
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTitle of the Presentation
10 pts
Outstanding
Clear, concise engaging and connects to the purpose of work
5 pts
Acceptable
Clear but not engaging or not connecting to the purpose of work
2.5 pts
Unacceptable
Unclear, does not connect to the purpose of work
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePLAN
10 pts
Outstanding
Comprehensively describes problem identified, what the plan is, the PICO(T) question, and summarizes results of the literature review.
5 pts
Acceptable
Adequately describes problem identified, what the plan is, the PICO(T) question, and summary of the results of the literature review.
2.5 pts
Unacceptable
Provides a limited description of the problem identified, what the plan is, the PICO(T) question, and results of the literature review.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTHE PROCESS
10 pts
Outstanding
Succinctly identifies all actions taken to implement the plan (problem, population, and time limit). Time frame for PDSA project is within student’s clinical practicum period.
5 pts
Acceptable
Identifies some actions taken to implement the plan (problem, population, and time limit) but not all. Time frame for PDSA project is within student’s clinical practicum period.
2.5 pts
Unacceptable
Fails to identify actions taken to implement the plan (problem, population, and time limit). Time frame for PDSA project falls outside student’s clinical practicum period.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDO
10 pts
Outstanding
Clearly describes observations made during the implementation period and demonstrates data collected over the intervention period of the project.
5 pts
Acceptable
Describes some vague observations during implementation period and some data collection over the intervention period of the project.
2.5 pts
Unacceptable
Does not describe any observations or collection of data over the intervention period of the project.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLiterature Supporting Intervention
10 pts
Outstanding
Clearly describes and summarizes the current state of literature related to the intervention. (Uses 5 or more articles)
5 pts
Acceptable
Adequately describes and summarizes the current state of literature related to the intervention. (Uses only 4 articles).
2.5 pts
Unacceptable
Poor description of current state of the literature related to the intervention (Uses less than 4 articles).
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSTUDY
10 pts
Outstanding
Clearly presents findings of the intervention, describes what was learned, and states whether or not goal was met.
5 pts
Acceptable
Vaguely describes findings of the intervention, what was learned, and whether or not goal was met.
2.5 pts
Unacceptable
Fails to present the findings of the intervention, and/or what was learned, and/or whether goals were met or not.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeACT
10 pts
Outstanding
Provides detail discussion of the findings of the PDSA cycle, if the plan worked, draws logical conclusion from the data, and discusses dissemination of findings.
5 pts
Acceptable
Vaguely describes the findings of the PDSA cycle, if the plan worked, conclusion from the data, and dissemination of findings.
2.5 pts
Unacceptable
Fails to discuss the findings of the PDSA cycle, if the plan worked, conclusion from the data, or dissemination of findings.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format
10 pts
Outstanding
APA (7th edition) style followed correctly.
5 pts
Acceptable
APA (7th edition) style and formatting have some minor errors.
2.5 pts
Unacceptable
Follows APA (7th edition) formatting occasionally and without consistency.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation
10 pts
Outstanding
The PowerPoint presentation is clear and engaging, and well-organized. Any audio or visual aids (e.g., slides, music, etc) contribute meaningfully to the presentation. The logic of the presentation is easy to follow. All verbal and/or written information is legible, understandable, and easy to see/hear.
5 pts
Acceptable
The PowerPoint presentation is clear and organized. The visuals are appealing, but the presenter was unclear presenting the issue.
2.5 pts
Unacceptable
The PowerPoint presentation was unclear and difficult to follow. The logical flow was confusing. The presentation was overly wordy, robotic, and/or audio and visual aids failed to add anything to the understandability of the presentation.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHandout
10 pts
Full Marks
The handout is well-organized and covers key points of the PDSA cycle.
5 pts
Acceptable
The handout is organized but only covers some of the key points of the PDSA cycle.
0 pts
Unacceptable
The handout is poorly design and difficult to read, missing the majority of the key points, or is completely missing.
10 pts
Total Points: 100
Previous Next
Interested in getting help with this assignment?
Get a professional writing team to work on your assignment!
Order Now
Recent postsFor this final assignment, you will prepare a brief paper detailing the steps undertaken to complete a presentation that disseminates information you assemble
Please choose to answer only one of the 2 following questions. Option 1: In your opinion and based on scientific, peer-reviewed published evidence, does child
At the beginning of the previous academic year, the institution announced it would drop football at the conclusion of the season. The announcement created pub
you will review current research in Personality and provide a critical evaluation of that personality research through an annotated bibliography. An annotated
In Module 5, we considered the third in our three-part series on research design. Specifically, the focus was on the longitudinal studies, in which the resear
Need help with a similar or different Task?
We have the best writers to help you. Hire Writer Now
