Research Studies Discussion
Research Studies Discussion
Research Studies Discussion
Research Studies Discussion
ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT:Research Studies Discussion
Follow the instructions provided in “Critique of Research Studies Instructions.”
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on Research Studies Discussion done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
Meet my deadline
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Critique of Research Studies – Part 2
1
Not submitted
0.00%
2
Unsatisfactory
75.00%
3
Less Than Satisfactory
80.00%
4
Satisfactory
88.00%
5
Good
92.00%
6
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
35.0 %Quantitative Methods: Protection of human rights, research design, population and sample, data collection and measurement, and procedures.
None
Critique is missing for quantitative methods.
Critique is vague and addresses some guidelines and criteria for all five sections of quantitative methods OR the critique is thorough but is missing three components. Critique is unsupported with evidence.
Critique is brief and addresses some guidelines and criteria for all five sections of quantitative methods OR the critique is thorough but is missing two components. Critique is somewhat supported with relevant evidence.
Critique is detailed and addresses most guidelines and criteria for all five sections of quantitative methods OR the critique is thorough but is missing a component. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.
Critique thoroughly addresses all guidelines and criteria for all five sections of quantitative methods. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.
35.0 %Qualitative Methods: Protection of participants’ rights, research design and research tradition, sampling and setting, data collection, procedures, and enhancement of trustworthiness.
None
Critique is missing for qualitative methods.
Critique is vague and addresses some guidelines and criteria for all six sections of qualitative methods OR the critique is thorough but is missing three components. Critique is unsupported with evidence.
Critique is brief and addresses some guidelines and criteria for all six sections of qualitative methods OR the critique is thorough but is missing two components. Critique is somewhat supported with relevant evidence.
Critique is detailed and addresses most guidelines and criteria for all six sections of qualitative methods OR the critique is thorough but is missing a component. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.
Critique thoroughly addresses all guidelines and criteria for all six sections of qualitative methods. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
20.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)
None
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are employed.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Audience-appropriate language is employed.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech.
The writer is clearly in command of standard, written academic English.
10.0 %Format
5.0 %Paper Format (1- inch margins; 12-point-font; double-spaced; Times New Roman, Arial, or Courier)
None
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
All format elements are correct.
5.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment)
None
No reference page is included. No citations are used.
Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.
Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.
Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and style is usually correct.
In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.
Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.
Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.
The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.
ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS
Discussion Questions (DQ)
Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.
Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.
One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.
I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.
Weekly Participation
Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.
In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.
Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).
Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.
APA Format and Writing Quality
Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).
Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.
I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.
Use of Direct Quotes
I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.
As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.
It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.
LopesWrite Policy
For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
Late Policy
The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.
Communication
Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.
Research Studies Discussion
Research Studies Discussion
Don’t wait until the last minute
Fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work asap.
Start My Order
Place your order now for a similar assignment, and have writers from our team of experts write it for you, guaranteeing you an A+
Need help with a similar or different Task?
We have the best writers to help you. Hire Writer Now
