Fully read Chap. 11: Ethically Engaging/Empowering Employees + the Michaelson and the Nikova/Cnossen articles. Then, respond to the following three questions in each of three paragraphs:
What are the specific benefits of fostering employee engagement in a workplace, and how do specific forms of organizational justice support this engagement.
How do we support work teams that are comprised of the mix of employee types, including ‘go-getters’ vs ‘fence-sitters’ vs ‘adversarials’?
Compare and contrast aspects of ‘meaningful’ work and the workplace environment, and support your response with one ethical theory.
Chapter 11: Ethically Engaging & Empowering Employees C. Michaelson, “Meaningful Work and Moral Worth,”amp; Professional Ethics Journal (2009), Vol. 28, No. 1/4), pp. 27-48 (see JSTOR on SFSU Library website) Nikolova, M. & Cnossen, F. (2020). What Makes Work Meaningful & Why Economists Should Care. http://ftp.iza.org/dp13112.pdf Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs Case Exercises: 100 Best Companies to Work For
Memos_Forums.docx
Memos / Forums – Section Summary
Forums and Memos are due prior to the start of every Thursday class … before 3:30 pm
Weekly Memos and Forums require that you respond to my posted questions about the assigned chapters, readings, and to one another on some assignments. Your writing must be analytical, researched, and individually written 3 – 4 full paragraphs in your own words ( NO copied wording; NO quotes!)
Hint: Does your written discussion demonstrate: 1) your comprehension of the assigned readings, 2) your own edited analysis of the key concepts/arguments from the readings with corrected spelling and grammar, and 3) a Reference section at the end of your posting listing your cited text pages and external business news/website/other research sources in APA reference format (Wikipedia is NOT a permitted reference!)
Memos / Forums are Due: prior to the start of each class (submission portal closes at exactly 3:30 pm each Thursday) [NO make-ups, late, or emailed submissions!]
GRADING: 0 – 10 pts. each week’s submission. Excellent and complete analytical writing uses clear references to the assigned readings without grammatical errors. Points are reduced for incomplete, vague, inaccurate, off-topic discussions and needed edits. Did you list your references at the end of your document – Author, Text/Article, pg. numbers used?? Copied or plagiarized memos = 0 pts and a discussion about academic integrity / referral to Office of Student Conduct (https://conduct.sfsu.edu/academic-dishonesty).
My comments for each week’s assignment and your grade points will be included in your gradebook before the next class meeting.
Interested in getting help with this assignment?
Get a professional writing team to work on your assignment!
Order Now
Recent postsFor this final assignment, you will prepare a brief paper detailing the steps undertaken to complete a presentation that disseminates information you assemble
Please choose to answer only one of the 2 following questions. Option 1: In your opinion and based on scientific, peer-reviewed published evidence, does child
At the beginning of the previous academic year, the institution announced it would drop football at the conclusion of the season. The announcement created pub
you will review current research in Personality and provide a critical evaluation of that personality research through an annotated bibliography. An annotated
In Module 5, we considered the third in our three-part series on research design. Specifically, the focus was on the longitudinal studies, in which the resear
Need help with a similar or different Task?
We have the best writers to help you. Hire Writer Now
