Skip to content
Home » You will be writing a critique of a quantitative research article. The article MUST be ‘research’.  The article can be a meta analysis but NOT a systematic review. As part of the approval

You will be writing a critique of a quantitative research article. The article MUST be ‘research’.  The article can be a meta analysis but NOT a systematic review. As part of the approval

You will be writing a critique of a quantitative research article.
The article MUST be “research”. 
The article can be a meta analysis but NOT a systematic review.
As part of the approval process, you MUST send me a copy of the entire article.
Find a quantitative research article/study.
You must get faculty approval for the article BEFORE you implement the assignment.
Follow the attached criteria

Sample_Format_for_Reviewing_Journal_Article1.pdf

Sample format, Page 1 of 2
Sample Format For Reviewing A Journal Article

Reading and summarizing a research article in the behavioral or medical sciences can be overwhelming.
Below is a simple model to guide students through this process.

Authors’ last names (year) conducted a study about ________________________. The
participants were/the setting was ___________________________. (New paragraph) The findings
were _____________________________. Discussion. (Possibly a new paragraph) The authors
suggested _____________________. Discussion.

Students should fill in the blanks with their own words. To copy directly from the article fails to show
comprehension and may also be considered plagiarism.

To “fill in the blanks”, a student should read the journal article and pay specific attention to:

Sentence #1- Authors’ last names (year) conducted a study about _________________.
 Read the Abstract; this will give an overview of the study’s (article’s) purpose.
 Read the entire article without trying to summarize it.
 Go back and read the Literature Review or Background section of the article. Toward the end of
the section, the authors should identify gaps in the existing literature and tell the reader how the
current study will fill that gap. The authors will also state their hypothesis (purpose) at the end of
this section.

Section #2 – The participants were/the setting was ___________________________.
 Read the Methods section of the paper. In this section, the authors will describe how the data was
collected, who was included in the sample, and any instruments used.
 A reader might want to consider sample size, demographic characteristics, or any interesting
protocol.
 It is not necessary to report every fact (i.e., 35% of the participants were male, 71% identified
their race as Asian).

Section #3 – The findings were _____________________________.
 Read the Findings section of the article.
 Some statistics may be confusing. Pay attention to key words such as “increased”, “decreased”,
“improved”, and “reduced”.
 “No change” may also be considered a significant finding.
 Next, read the Discussion section. The authors will present the findings in general terms.

Section #4 – The authors suggested _____________________.
 Read the Discussion section and look for comments that the authors made about the intervention
or program such as “Did it work?” or “Should it be continued?”.
 Look for the author’s critique of why the study did or did not produce results. Did anything
unexpected influence the findings?
 The author may suggest a future line of research or “next steps” to improve the body of
knowledge.

Sample format, Page 2 of 2
Additional Considerations:
 A literature review is a summary of what research has been completed in a topic area; it should be
summarized in your own words.
 Read the entire article first and then go back and take notes. Jot down notes in your own words.
This increases comprehension as well as decreases the likelihood of plagiarism.
 The review is written in third person; no “I” or “you”.
 Unless stated otherwise, a literature review ideally reflects articles published in the last five to ten
years.
 Not every detail or fact needs to be reported. A reader will obtain a copy of the article if more
information is needed.
 Write the literature review in the past tense; the research has already been completed.
 The article cannot “do”, “find”, or “say” anything. The authors are the people who conducted the
study.
 The above format is a guideline. It may be necessary to change the verbs or to expand an idea.

Interested in getting help with this assignment?
Get a professional writing team to work on your assignment!
Order Now
Recent postsFor this final assignment, you will prepare a brief paper detailing the steps undertaken to complete a presentation that disseminates information you assemble
Please choose to answer only one of the 2 following questions. Option 1: In your opinion and based on scientific, peer-reviewed published evidence, does child
At the beginning of the previous academic year, the institution announced it would drop football at the conclusion of the season. The announcement created pub
you will review current research in Personality and provide a critical evaluation of that personality research through an annotated bibliography. An annotated
In Module 5, we considered the third in our three-part series on research design. Specifically, the focus was on the longitudinal studies, in which the resear

Need help with a similar or different Task?

We have the best writers to help you. Hire Writer Now

ORDER NOW